Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is experimental motion blindness due to sensory suppression? An ERP approach

  • Michael Niedeggen
  • , Arash Sahraie
  • , Guido Hesselmann
  • , Maarten Milders
  • , Colin Blakemore

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Recent psychophysical studies have revealed attentional modulation of visual motion perception and interest now focuses on the locus of this interaction. Using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) we examined whether transient motion blindness evoked in a dual task [Vision Res. 41 (2001) 1613-1617] is related to a selection process occurring at the stage of sensory processing or at a higher level. In our paradigm, a particular change of colour of the fixation point cued the subject to detect a brief episode of coherent random dot motion embedded in a succession of episodes of incoherent motion. Detection of the coherent motion was significantly impaired when it occurred simultaneously with the colour cue, and recovered over the subsequent 300 ms. This functional relationship was reflected in the amplitude of a sensory, motion-evoked component (N200), and in a late positive complex (P300). However, a direct comparison of ERPs produced by stimuli that were detected or missed revealed differences only in the P300 component. These results indicate that attenuation of sensory motion processing does not account for this transient, attention-induced deficit in visual motion perception. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-247
JournalCognitive Brain Research
Volume13
Issue number2
Online published27 Nov 2001
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2002
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Attention
  • Event-related brain potential
  • Experimental blindness
  • Motion perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is experimental motion blindness due to sensory suppression? An ERP approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this