Involution and vacuum: Comments on mainstream U.S. media studies

Chin-Chuan Lee*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mainstream U.S. media studies has been marked by an involuntary process toward greater self-absorption and internal development, hence privileging methodologically elaborate study of neatly delineated problems over conceptual or theoretical innovation. Communication research is increasingly divorced from the larger contexts of the humanities and social sciences. It may also risk being criticized for operating in historical and global vacuum. The solution is to return to what C. Wright Mills describes as the classic tradition of ‘intellectual craftsmanship’ that encourages the production of sociological imagination.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-662
JournalInternational Communication Gazette
Volume78
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Research Keywords

  • Academic involution
  • intellectual craftsmanship
  • international communication
  • sociological imagination
  • U.S. media studies
  • Wilbur Schramm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Involution and vacuum: Comments on mainstream U.S. media studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this