Interdiscursive collaboration in public relations contexts
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 127 - 146 |
Journal / Publication | Iberica |
Volume | 25 |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2013 |
Link(s)
Attachment(s) | Documents
Publisher's Copyright Statement
|
---|---|
Document Link | Links
|
Link to Scopus | https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84876901190&origin=recordpage |
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(8fccd41f-192c-4b86-9db9-85034ed9c07a).html |
Abstract
Interdiscursive collaborative construction of professional genres (Bhatia, 2004 & 2010; Bremner, 2006; Smart, 2006) within the framework of "communities of practice" (Lave & Wenger, 1991) can be viewed as a useful instrument for developing writing expertise to initiate novice writers into the conventions of corporate writing. Drawing on evidence from public relations (PR) writing contexts in Hong Kong, the paper focuses on the dynamics of participation in collaborative PR practice and on the deconstruction of the collaborative process as evidenced in the deconstruction of various drafts (from brainstorming to the final product) and through the perceptions of some of the key PR practitioners in the industry. The paper will have implications for our understanding of interdiscursivity in genre theory (Bhatia, 2010) and for the collaborative writing process within the academy as well as in the workplace.
Research Area(s)
- interdiscursive collaboration, genre theory, community of practice, writing, public relations.
Citation Format(s)
Interdiscursive collaboration in public relations contexts. / Bhatia, Vijay K.; Jones, Rodney H.; Bremner, Stephen et al.
In: Iberica, Vol. 25, 04.2013, p. 127 - 146.
In: Iberica, Vol. 25, 04.2013, p. 127 - 146.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Download Statistics
No data available