Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 61-72 |
Journal / Publication | Decision Support Systems |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2011 |
Link(s)
DOI | DOI |
---|---|
Attachment(s) | Documents
Publisher's Copyright Statement
|
Link to Scopus | https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80455155173&origin=recordpage |
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(3f7d3af2-89f9-49b8-bdde-411a163fbdc0).html |
Abstract
The use of instant messaging (IM) technology at work is controversial, due to the interruptions it may cause and the difficulties associated with quantifying its benefits for individuals, teams and organizations. In this study, we investigate the use and impact of IM tools in the workplace. Based on theories of communication performance and social networks, we propose that while the use of IM will cause work interruption, it will also lead to improved communication quality and the establishment of trust between colleagues. These mediating variables will in turn influence group outcomes. We validate our research model with data collected through a survey of 253 working professionals. The data suggests IM can significantly contribute to communication performance in the workplace, where the benefits overwhelm the negative effects associated with work interruption. The theoretical and practical contribution and implications of the research are discussed. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Research Area(s)
- Communication performance, Communication quality, Group outcomes, Instant messaging (IM), Trust, Work interruption
Citation Format(s)
Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work. / Ou, Carol X.J.; Davison, Robert M.
In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 52, No. 1, 12.2011, p. 61-72.
In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 52, No. 1, 12.2011, p. 61-72.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Download Statistics
No data available