TY - CHAP
T1 - Integrity management under state hierarchy
T2 - controlling corruption in China
AU - Gong, Ting
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In contrast to the early campaign-style anti-corruption strategy based on nationwide uniformity, disparate local integrity initiatives and programs proliferated in China in recent years. Local innovation in controlling corruption and managing government integrity has been encouraged by the central government. Drawing on the author's fieldwork in Guangdong, this chapter investigates the rationale behind the new development and addresses the question of how and why the central leadership has become receptive to local initiatives in cadre management, an area where political conformity was deemed necessary by an authoritarian regime. It suggests that the strategic adjustment testifies to the institutional failure of the earlier anti-corruption regime that manifested in, inter alia, an acute agency loss problem. The emerging approach to integrity management nevertheless has paradoxical institutional roots. It indicates the new thinking of the central authorities on holding local governments responsible for integrity management. However, just as clearly, the adjustment is also driven by the center's concern about losing control and its desire to “manage” government integrity under the state's hierarchy.
AB - In contrast to the early campaign-style anti-corruption strategy based on nationwide uniformity, disparate local integrity initiatives and programs proliferated in China in recent years. Local innovation in controlling corruption and managing government integrity has been encouraged by the central government. Drawing on the author's fieldwork in Guangdong, this chapter investigates the rationale behind the new development and addresses the question of how and why the central leadership has become receptive to local initiatives in cadre management, an area where political conformity was deemed necessary by an authoritarian regime. It suggests that the strategic adjustment testifies to the institutional failure of the earlier anti-corruption regime that manifested in, inter alia, an acute agency loss problem. The emerging approach to integrity management nevertheless has paradoxical institutional roots. It indicates the new thinking of the central authorities on holding local governments responsible for integrity management. However, just as clearly, the adjustment is also driven by the center's concern about losing control and its desire to “manage” government integrity under the state's hierarchy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137422233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137422233&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.4337/9781789909951.00014
DO - 10.4337/9781789909951.00014
M3 - RGC 12 - Chapter in an edited book (Author)
SN - 9781789909944
T3 - Handbooks of Research on Contemporary China
SP - 81
EP - 95
BT - Handbook of Public Policy and Public Administration in China
A2 - Zang, Xiaowei
A2 - Chan, Hon S.
PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
CY - Cheltenham
ER -