Institutional Distance and Partnership Governance Arrangements: An Exploratory Study of the Implementation of a Large Cross-Border Reconstruction Project in China

Xinya Guan, Neale Gilbert O’Connor, Zhigang Wang*, Zhilong Tian, S. Fiona Chan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This research intends to investigate the effects of three-dimensional institutional distances, namely regulatory, normative, and cognitive distances, on the partner match and governance mechanisms in cross-sector and cross-border collaborations. Methodology/Approach: We chose a major cross-border reconstruction project donated by Hong Kong SAR to Sichuan Province as the research setting regarding the explicit institutional differences, although both belong to China. Based on archival data and in-depth interviews with personnel in charge of project supervision and management from both partners, we gain further insights into the governance mechanisms for a successful cross-sector and cross-broader partnership. Findings: We investigate the institutional distances between HKSAR and mainland China partners in regulatory, normative, and cognitive aspects during reconstruction. We reveal the patterns of partner match and various effective governance mechanisms that partners utilize to manage institutional distance, including cooperative roles, regulatory rules, project supervision, assessment, and formal and informal communications. Research Implications: We introduce an institutional distance between partners as an important contingency and a constraint on the partner match (structure and governance) and the governance mechanisms used to manage the cross-border collaborative process, including business and non-business partners. Practical Implications: The concept of institutional distances should help cross-sector partners with institutional differences better understand the differences and importance of mutual understanding and efficient governance mechanisms. Our findings provide practical governance mechanisms for managing cross-sector collaborations, such as government agencies and firms, especially in cross-border settings. Originality/Value/Contribution of the paper: We propose a cross-border partner governance model for future researchers to investigate the effects of institutional distance on partnership governance structure and mechanisms. We extend the B2B partnership governances by incorporating the non-business actors into consideration. © 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-65
JournalJournal of Business-to-Business Marketing
Volume31
Issue number1
Online published6 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Research Keywords

  • A cross-border collaborative project
  • China
  • institutional distance
  • partnership governance strategy
  • project performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional Distance and Partnership Governance Arrangements: An Exploratory Study of the Implementation of a Large Cross-Border Reconstruction Project in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this