Insights from experiments with duopoly games : rational incremental decision-making
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1328-1351 |
Journal / Publication | Public Management Review |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 9 |
Online published | 14 Feb 2017 |
Publication status | Published - 21 Oct 2017 |
Link(s)
Abstract
This study explores rational incremental decision-making, one of the most powerful principles in government decision-making. Although ‘muddling through’ is applicable in many decision-making situations, it has been argued that incremental decisions are rational in some conditions. This study replicates the game experiment using two-person games with the factorial design of uncertainty and risk in Hong Kong and Korea. Findings show that incremental decisions in prior rounds lead to rational results and thereby better rewards, and that uncertainty and risk slow down the process of reaching the Nash equilibrium. The conclusion discusses implications of rational incrementalism.
Research Area(s)
- experiment, incrementalism, rational decision-making, replication, Signalling game
Citation Format(s)
Insights from experiments with duopoly games : rational incremental decision-making. / Lee, M. Jin; Moon, M. Jae; Kim, Jungsook.
In: Public Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 9, 21.10.2017, p. 1328-1351.Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review