TY - JOUR
T1 - Insight Into Puncture-Induced Thermal Runaway in Lithium-Ion Batteries to Reduce Fire Risks in Electric Vehicle Collisions
AU - Zhao, Hong
AU - Bo, Xiangkun
AU - Zhang, Zhiguo
AU - Wang, Li
AU - Daoud, Walid A.
AU - He, Xiangming
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) power electric vehicles through exceptional energy density but pose critical safety risks when mechanically compromised, particularly through nail penetration-induced thermal runaway. This review synthesizes experimental and modeling studies to establish the thermal runaway initiation hierarchy: (1) State-of-charge (SOC) (doubles thermal runaway probability at over 60% SOC), (2) cathode chemistry (thermal runaway propagation of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1-based batteries is eightfold faster than that of LiFePO4-based batteries), (3) nail properties (the possibility of short-circuit current of steel-based batteries is 40% higher than that of copper-based batteries), and (4) penetration dynamics (depth's impact is more than that of separator thickness in triggering cascading failures). Thermal runaway mechanisms involve synergistic electrochemical–thermal–mechanical coupling, where localized heating (higher than 1 × 10⁴ K/s) initiates separator collapse (80°C–120°C) and electrolyte decomposition (200°C). Mitigation strategies focus on mechanically graded separators (SiO₂/polymer composites: increasing 180% in puncture resistance); shear-thickening adhesives reducing impact forces by 35%–60%; halogen-free electrolytes within a 2 s self-extinguishing time; and solid-state architectures showing 0% thermal runaway incidence in nail penetration tests. Critical gaps persist in standardizing penetration protocols (velocity: 0.1–80 mm/s variations across studies) and modeling micro-short circuits. Emerging solutions prioritize materials-by-design approaches combining sacrificial microstructures with embedded thermal sensors. This analysis provides a roadmap for developing intrinsically safe LIBs that maintain energy density while achieving automotive-grade mechanical robustness (ISO 6469-1 compliance), ultimately advancing collision-resilient electric vehicle battery systems.
© 2025 The Author(s). Battery Energy published by Xijing University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
AB - Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) power electric vehicles through exceptional energy density but pose critical safety risks when mechanically compromised, particularly through nail penetration-induced thermal runaway. This review synthesizes experimental and modeling studies to establish the thermal runaway initiation hierarchy: (1) State-of-charge (SOC) (doubles thermal runaway probability at over 60% SOC), (2) cathode chemistry (thermal runaway propagation of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1-based batteries is eightfold faster than that of LiFePO4-based batteries), (3) nail properties (the possibility of short-circuit current of steel-based batteries is 40% higher than that of copper-based batteries), and (4) penetration dynamics (depth's impact is more than that of separator thickness in triggering cascading failures). Thermal runaway mechanisms involve synergistic electrochemical–thermal–mechanical coupling, where localized heating (higher than 1 × 10⁴ K/s) initiates separator collapse (80°C–120°C) and electrolyte decomposition (200°C). Mitigation strategies focus on mechanically graded separators (SiO₂/polymer composites: increasing 180% in puncture resistance); shear-thickening adhesives reducing impact forces by 35%–60%; halogen-free electrolytes within a 2 s self-extinguishing time; and solid-state architectures showing 0% thermal runaway incidence in nail penetration tests. Critical gaps persist in standardizing penetration protocols (velocity: 0.1–80 mm/s variations across studies) and modeling micro-short circuits. Emerging solutions prioritize materials-by-design approaches combining sacrificial microstructures with embedded thermal sensors. This analysis provides a roadmap for developing intrinsically safe LIBs that maintain energy density while achieving automotive-grade mechanical robustness (ISO 6469-1 compliance), ultimately advancing collision-resilient electric vehicle battery systems.
© 2025 The Author(s). Battery Energy published by Xijing University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
KW - internal short circuit
KW - lithium-ion batteries
KW - mechanical safety
KW - nail penetration
KW - thermal runaway
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012138024
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105012138024&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1002/bte2.20250036
DO - 10.1002/bte2.20250036
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 2768-1688
VL - 4
JO - Battery Energy
JF - Battery Energy
IS - 6
M1 - e70041
ER -