Inhomogeneities of carbonation depth distributions in recycled aggregate concretes: A visualisation and quantification study

Renjie Mi, Ganghua Pan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The carbonation depths nonuniformly distribute in recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) because it has two kinds of mortars and three kinds of interfacial transition zones; but the inhomogeneity of the distribution is underestimated. Hereby, the inhomogeneities in RACs prepared with modelled industrially-produced and laboratory-produced recycled coarse aggregates (RCAs) were visualised and quantified using a proposed method. Afterwards, the influences of RCA types, RCA replacement ratios and strengthening methods of RCA on the average carbonation depths, their errors and the maximum carbonation depths were examined. The results showed that the carbonation depth distributions of RACs presented clear inhomogeneities. Utilising the CO2 curing technology for RCA might not reduce the inhomogeneities; but light effects can be observed through selecting a proper RCA or using a nano-SiO2 slurry soaking method for RCA. Reducing the maximum carbonation depth of RAC by selecting an appropriate RCA was more effective compared with by using the nano-SiO2 slurry soaking method. Besides, predicting the carbonation degree of RAC by using the maximum carbonation depth was more conservative than by using the average carbonation depth.
Original languageEnglish
Article number127300
JournalConstruction and Building Materials
Volume330
Online published30 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 May 2022

Research Keywords

  • Carbonation depth distribution
  • Inhomogeneity
  • Quantification
  • Recycled aggregate concrete
  • Visualisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inhomogeneities of carbonation depth distributions in recycled aggregate concretes: A visualisation and quantification study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this