Incentivizing Private Antitrust Enforcement to Promote Leniency Applications

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both leniency programs and private antitrust enforcement are essential in combating cartels. The literature demonstrates that society benefits from both increased private actions and leniency applications. However, the present view is that private enforcement discourages cartel members from seeking leniency. Proponents of this view blame follow-on civil actions in the wake of successful public antitrust enforcement cases. This concern hinders the development of private antitrust enforcement. Nevertheless, the literature that expresses such a concern fails to consider standalone civil actions' impact. Building on a game theory model of leniency programs by Professor Joseph E. Harrington, this article reinvestigates the relationship between the two seemingly contradictory procedural devices of leniency programs and private enforcement. Considering a revised leniency game, this article reveals that incentivizing private antitrust enforcement does not necessarily discourage leniency applications. Accordingly, this article proposes ways for legislators to use private enforcement as a tool to promote leniency applications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)728-749
JournalJournal of Competition Law and Economics
Volume17
Issue number3
Online published21 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incentivizing Private Antitrust Enforcement to Promote Leniency Applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this