Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In search of laterally heterogeneous viscosity models of glacial isostatic adjustment with the ICE-6G C global ice history model

  • Tanghua Li
  • , Patrick Wu
  • , Holger Steffen
  • , Hansheng Wang

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Most models of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) assume that the Earth is laterally homogeneous. However, seismic and geological observations clearly show that the Earth's mantle is laterally heterogeneous. Previous studies of GIA with lateral heterogeneity mostly focused on its effect or sensitivity on GIA predictions, and it is not clear to what extent can lateral heterogeneity solve the misfits between GIA predictions and observations. Our aim is to search for the best 3-D viscosity models that can simultaneously fit the global relative sea level data, the peak uplift rates (u-dot from the Global Navigation Satellite System) and peak gravityrate- of-change (g-dot from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission) in Laurentia and Fennoscandia. However, the search is dependent on the ice and viscosity model inputs-the latter depends on the background viscosity and the seismic tomography models used. In this paper, the ICE-6G C ice model, with Bunge and Grand's seismic tomography model and background viscosity models close to VM5 will be assumed. A coupled Laplacefinite element method is used to compute gravitationally self-consistent sea level change with time-dependent coastlines and rotational feedback in addition to changes in deformation, gravity and the state of stress. Several laterally heterogeneous models are found to fit the global sea level data better than laterally homogeneous models. Two of these laterally heterogeneous models also fit the observed peak g-dot and u-dot rates in Laurentia simultaneously. However, even with the introduction of lateral heterogeneity, no model that is able to fit the present-day g-dot and uplift rate data in Fennoscandia has been found. Therefore, either the ice history of ICE-6G C in Fennoscandia and Barents Sea needs some modifications or the sublithospheric property/non-thermal effect underneath northern Europe must be different from that underneath Laurentia. © The Author(s) 2018.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1191-1205
JournalGeophysical Journal International
Volume214
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Funding

This work is supported by GRF grant 17315316 from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council to PW. HW is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41431070 and 41590854). The FE calculation was performed with the ABAQUS package from Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. This research is conducted, in part, using the research computing facilities and/or advisory services offered by Information Technology Services, the University of Hong Kong.

Research Keywords

  • Creep d
  • Crustal deformation
  • Lateral heterogeneity
  • Loading of the Earth
  • Sea level change
  • Time variable gravity

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In search of laterally heterogeneous viscosity models of glacial isostatic adjustment with the ICE-6G C global ice history model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this