Abstract
I develop a model to explain why stock returns are positively cross‐autocorrelated. When market makers observe noisy signals about the value of their stocks but cannot instantaneously condition prices on the signals of other stocks, which contain marketwide information, the pricing error of one stock is correlated with the other signals. As market makers adjust prices after observing true values or previous price changes of other stocks, stock returns become positively cross‐autocorrelated. If the signal quality differs among stocks, the cross‐autocorrelation pattern is asymmetric. I show that both own‐ and cross‐autocorrelations are higher when market movements are larger. 1993 The American Finance Association
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1211-1230 |
| Journal | The Journal of Finance |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 1993 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Imperfect Information and Cross‐Autocorrelation among Stock Prices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver