Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly used in critical domains, where reliable explanations are vital for supporting human decision-making. However, the common practice of graph symmetrization discards directional information, leading to significant information loss and misleading explanations. Our analysis demonstrates how this practice compromises explanation fidelity. Through theoretical and empirical studies, we show that preserving directional semantics significantly improves explanation quality, ensuring more faithful insights for human decision-makers. These findings highlight the need for direction-aware GNN explainability in security-critical applications.
© 2025, Changsheng Sun. Under license to IEEE
© 2025, Changsheng Sun. Under license to IEEE
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings - 46th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW 2025) |
| Editors | Marina Blanton, William Enck, Cristina Nita-Rotaru |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 979-8-3315-6643-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s).Research Keywords
- Explainable AI
- Post-hoc Explanations
- Graph Learning
- Trustworthy Systems
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ignoring Directionality Leads to Compromised Graph Neural Network Explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver