Genetic based discrete particle swarm optimization for Elderly Day Care Center timetabling
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 125-138 |
Journal / Publication | Computers and Operations Research |
Volume | 65 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2016 |
Link(s)
Abstract
The timetabling problem of local Elderly Day Care Centers (EDCCs) is formulated into a weighted maximum constraint satisfaction problem (Max-CSP) in this study. The EDCC timetabling problem is a multi-dimensional assignment problem, where users (elderly) are required to perform activities that require different venues and timeslots, depending on operational constraints. These constraints are categorized into two: hard constraints, which must be fulfilled strictly, and soft constraints, which may be violated but with a penalty. Numerous methods have been successfully applied to the weighted Max-CSP; these methods include exact algorithms based on branch and bound techniques, and approximation methods based on repair heuristics, such as the min-conflict heuristic. This study aims to explore the potential of evolutionary algorithms by proposing a genetic-based discrete particle swarm optimization (GDPSO) to solve the EDCC timetabling problem. The proposed method is compared with the min-conflict random-walk algorithm (MCRW), Tabu search (TS), standard particle swarm optimization (SPSO), and a guided genetic algorithm (GGA). Computational evidence shows that GDPSO significantly outperforms the other algorithms in terms of solution quality and efficiency.
Research Area(s)
- Discrete particle swarm optimization, Genetic algorithm, Min-conflict random walk, Tabu search, Timetabling problem, Weighted max-constraint satisfaction problem
Citation Format(s)
Genetic based discrete particle swarm optimization for Elderly Day Care Center timetabling. / LIN, Meiyan; CHIN, Kwai Sang; TSUI, Kwok Leung et al.
In: Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 65, 01.2016, p. 125-138.
In: Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 65, 01.2016, p. 125-138.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review