TY - JOUR
T1 - General vs. specific
T2 - How location information control drives performance in peer-to-peer accommodation
AU - Wang, Chenze
AU - Liu, Xiaoxiao
AU - Xiao, Zhenxin
AU - Gong, Xiang
AU - Dang, Jinming
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Unlike traditional hotels that explicitly specify their geographical locations, hosts on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms can partially conceal their properties' location information, showcasing only a general area in public searches for potential guests. However, the impact of this information control has been underexplored. Drawing upon the communication privacy management theory and leveraging a unique Airbnb panel dataset from multiple sources, this study investigates the effect of partial location information concealment on property sales performance. Findings show that partially concealing location information leads to an 18.4% increase in occupancy rates compared to disclosing specific location details. Additionally, the effect of location concealment is contingent upon co-owner responsibility boundaries (i.e., host identity verification, guest screening), as well as environmental density boundaries (i.e., population density, listing density). Furthermore, a scenario-based experiment confirms the main effect, and reveals that guests’ sense of control and perceived risks serve as the underlying mechanisms driving this direct effect. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd.
AB - Unlike traditional hotels that explicitly specify their geographical locations, hosts on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms can partially conceal their properties' location information, showcasing only a general area in public searches for potential guests. However, the impact of this information control has been underexplored. Drawing upon the communication privacy management theory and leveraging a unique Airbnb panel dataset from multiple sources, this study investigates the effect of partial location information concealment on property sales performance. Findings show that partially concealing location information leads to an 18.4% increase in occupancy rates compared to disclosing specific location details. Additionally, the effect of location concealment is contingent upon co-owner responsibility boundaries (i.e., host identity verification, guest screening), as well as environmental density boundaries (i.e., population density, listing density). Furthermore, a scenario-based experiment confirms the main effect, and reveals that guests’ sense of control and perceived risks serve as the underlying mechanisms driving this direct effect. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd.
KW - Communication privacy management theory
KW - Information concealment
KW - Information control
KW - Peer-to-peer accommodation
KW - Property location
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204021203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204021203&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105037
DO - 10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105037
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0261-5177
VL - 107
JO - Tourism Management
JF - Tourism Management
M1 - 105037
ER -