FROM THE GLOBAL ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT TO THE CHINESE VERSION OF NAFMII : A STANDARD FORM CONTRACT AS THE SOURCE OF LEGAL TRANSPLANT, IRRITATION, AND INTEGRATION
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-36 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal / Publication | George Mason International Law Journal |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Mar 2024 |
Link(s)
| Document Link | Links
|
|---|---|
| Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(c1829db3-af55-4ca8-bf61-ca0f14e5cd28).html |
Abstract
The legal transplant is frequently used to justify a legal change in the recipient’s jurisdiction. Close examination of a global standard form contract, such as the ISDA Master Agreement 2002 and its Chinese version, the NAFMII Agreement 2009, shows that judicial divergences over the boilerplate terms offer a mechanism for an intensified process of integration between the recipient’s policies and international private law or transnational law.
Bibliographic Note
Publication date information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.
Citation Format(s)
FROM THE GLOBAL ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT TO THE CHINESE VERSION OF NAFMII: A STANDARD FORM CONTRACT AS THE SOURCE OF LEGAL TRANSPLANT, IRRITATION, AND INTEGRATION. / Hsiao, Mark.
In: George Mason International Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 19.03.2024, p. 1-36.
In: George Mason International Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 19.03.2024, p. 1-36.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
