Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From Disciplinary Welfare Sanction to Punishment and Deterrence: Contemporary Changes in Hong Kong's Youth Sentencing Philosophy

  • Aaron H. L. Wong*
  • , Wing Hong Chui
  • , Paul Vinod Khiatani
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

Previous literature up to the 1990s has established 'disciplinary welfare sanction' as the dominant youth sentencing philosophy in Hong Kong. This article aims to conceptualise contemporary changes in youth sentencing philosophy and practices since the 2000s. By examining representative court judgements, it is argued that ‘disciplinary welfare sanction’ ceased to operate as a youth sentencing approach in 2001 and that three inconsistent approaches (i.e. welfare, balanced and offence-based/punitive) emerged between 2001 and 2020. It is further suggested that since 2020, the offence-based/punitive approach has gained dominance, and Hong Kong has entered into a new era of punitive youth sentencing. © The Author(s) 2026.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalYouth Justice
DOIs
Publication statusOnline published - 8 Apr 2026

Research Keywords

  • deterrence
  • Hong Kong
  • juvenile justice
  • punishment
  • rehabilitation
  • youth justice
  • youth sentencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Disciplinary Welfare Sanction to Punishment and Deterrence: Contemporary Changes in Hong Kong's Youth Sentencing Philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this