Abstract
It is well known that human beings do not always change opinions or attitudes, since the duration of interaction with others usually has a significant impact on one's decision-making. Based on this observation, we introduce a freezing period into the voter model, in which the frozen individuals have a weakened opinion switching ability. We unfold the presence of an optimal freezing period, which leads to the fastest consensus, using computation simulations as well as theoretical analysis. We demonstrate that the essence of an accelerated consensus is attributed to the biased random walk of the interface between adjacent opinion clusters. The emergence of an optimal freezing period is robust against the size of the system and the number of distinct opinions. This study is instructive for understanding human collective behavior in other relevant fields.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 3597 |
| Journal | Scientific Reports |
| Volume | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Jan 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Funding
This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71203017, No.61272173, No.61374169), the Key Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (No.12AGL010), and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (No.DUT12JR08, No.DUT13LK38). L.W. also acknowledges the partial support by Fudan University Excellent Doctoral Research Program (985 Project).
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Freezing period strongly impacts the emergence of a global consensus in the voter model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver