Four challenges to accountability in contemporary public administration : Lessons from the United States and China

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalNot applicablepeer-review

21 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Journal / PublicationAdministration and Society
Volume42
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Abstract

Using the Romzek-Dubnick typology of accountability, the authors analyze challenges that reinvention and new public management reforms in the United States and China present with regard to maintaining legal controls, protecting non-mission-based administrative objectives, pursuing public values, and sustaining hierarchical authority. The authors show that reforms-especially outsourcing and results orientation-have very different consequences in the dissimilar U.S. and Chinese legal and political settings. The analysis contributes to those public administrative theories holding that when it comes to reform, law and politics matter, and that even when administrative problems are similar across nations, their solutions may differ. © 2010 SAGE Publications.

Research Area(s)

  • Accountability, Administrative reform, Common targets, New public management, Public values