Four challenges to accountability in contemporary public administration: Lessons from the United States and China

Hon S. Chan, David H. Rosenbloom

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using the Romzek-Dubnick typology of accountability, the authors analyze challenges that reinvention and new public management reforms in the United States and China present with regard to maintaining legal controls, protecting non-mission-based administrative objectives, pursuing public values, and sustaining hierarchical authority. The authors show that reforms-especially outsourcing and results orientation-have very different consequences in the dissimilar U.S. and Chinese legal and political settings. The analysis contributes to those public administrative theories holding that when it comes to reform, law and politics matter, and that even when administrative problems are similar across nations, their solutions may differ. © 2010 SAGE Publications.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume42
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Research Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Administrative reform
  • Common targets
  • New public management
  • Public values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Four challenges to accountability in contemporary public administration: Lessons from the United States and China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this