Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fiscal decentralization, equalization, and intra-provincial inequality in China

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

Using a nationwide county-level panel dataset for the years 1995–2009, this paper conducts the first analysis in the literature to examine the impacts of fiscal decentralization and fiscal equalization, both measured at the sub-provincial level, on intra-provincial inequality in China. While fiscal decentralization offers significant advantages regarding public expenditure efficiency, a potentially large disadvantage is that it may lead to increased regional inequality. In this paper, in line with our theoretical hypotheses, we find that while fiscal decentralization at the sub-provincial level in China leads to larger intra-provincial inequality, fiscal equalization efforts performed by provincial governments tend to mitigate the detrimental effect of fiscal decentralization on intra-provincial inequality. Our results also indicate that the quantitative effects of fiscal decentralization on regional inequality tend to be larger when they are measured from the expenditure side, which is consistent with the fact that expenditure decentralization is a much more meaningful measure of decentralization in China. Overall, we provide evidence on the potential inequality costs of using fiscal decentralization as a development strategy. At the same time, we emphasize the importance of implementing a fiscal equalization program to ensure the overall success of decentralization policy. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-281
JournalInternational Tax and Public Finance
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Funding

We would like to thank Guangrong Ma for providing some of the data used in this paper. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71403276; 71533006), the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (No. 151085), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0573) of the Ministry of Education of China. We are grateful for helpful comments from session participants at the 2015 Annual Congress of International Institute of Public Finance, the 2015 China Economist Society Annual Meeting at Chongqing University, the 2015 China Public Finance Forum at Peking University, as well as seminar participants at Renmin University. We are especially grateful to the editor and two anonymous referees for many helpful comments and suggestions that have substantially improved the paper.

Research Keywords

  • China
  • Equalization
  • Fiscal decentralization
  • Intra-provincial Inequality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fiscal decentralization, equalization, and intra-provincial inequality in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this