Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Financing conservation: some empirical evidence from Florida local governments

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Government is the primary financer of conservation services, but conservation financing in government is rarely studied. This study makes two contributions to understanding conservation financing in government. First, it develops a framework to classify and analyse conservation funding. Applying this framework to the data from Florida county governments, this study finds that conservation funding has become more stable and secure. More resources are used for large and long-term capital projects that benefit not only the current generation but also future generations, which reflects the ultimate goal of conservation. Second, this research offers an explanation about why some governments spend more on conservation than others. The results suggest that conservation funding in government is the result of combined forces in environmental pressure of economic activities and budgetary politics. The paper concludes that government should develop a structured conservation funding strategy that includes close monitoring of environmental pressure and proper political and institutional responses to the pressure. © 2013 University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)733-750
    JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
    Volume57
    Issue number5
    Online published3 Apr 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Research Keywords

    • conservation finance
    • environmental finance
    • local government environmental management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Financing conservation: some empirical evidence from Florida local governments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this