Abstract
Government is the primary financer of conservation services, but conservation financing in government is rarely studied. This study makes two contributions to understanding conservation financing in government. First, it develops a framework to classify and analyse conservation funding. Applying this framework to the data from Florida county governments, this study finds that conservation funding has become more stable and secure. More resources are used for large and long-term capital projects that benefit not only the current generation but also future generations, which reflects the ultimate goal of conservation. Second, this research offers an explanation about why some governments spend more on conservation than others. The results suggest that conservation funding in government is the result of combined forces in environmental pressure of economic activities and budgetary politics. The paper concludes that government should develop a structured conservation funding strategy that includes close monitoring of environmental pressure and proper political and institutional responses to the pressure. © 2013 University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 733-750 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Planning and Management |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Online published | 3 Apr 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Research Keywords
- conservation finance
- environmental finance
- local government environmental management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Financing conservation: some empirical evidence from Florida local governments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver