TY - JOUR
T1 - Fin erosion on rainbow trout on commercial trout farms in the United Kingdom
AU - ST-HILAIRE, S.
AU - ELLIS, T.
AU - COOKE, A.
AU - NORTH, B. P.
AU - TURNBULL, J. F.
AU - KNOWLES, T.
AU - KESTIN, S.
PY - 2006/9/30
Y1 - 2006/9/30
N2 - Fish weighing less than 30 g and more than 100 g were sampled from 38 rearing units on 10 commercial farms growing rainbow trout for the table market. A fin index was calculated for each of the eight rayed fins on 949 trout by dividing their length by the standard length of the fish. There was a large range in the indices of all eight fins. The fin indices of the small and large fish were compared, controlling for farm effect. With the exception of the dorsal fin, all the indices were larger for the small fish than for the large fish, but the magnitude of the difference was greater for some fins than others. In comparison with the fins of wild fish, the pectoral and dorsal fins appeared to be most eroded and the damage to these fins was evident even in the small fish. The erosion of the caudal, anal and ventral (or pelvic) fins was more prominent in the larger fish. Variations in the fin indices of the caudal, anal and ventral fins suggested that there was little variation between rearing units on the same farm, but that there was significant variation between individual fish in the same rearing units, and between fish on different farms.
AB - Fish weighing less than 30 g and more than 100 g were sampled from 38 rearing units on 10 commercial farms growing rainbow trout for the table market. A fin index was calculated for each of the eight rayed fins on 949 trout by dividing their length by the standard length of the fish. There was a large range in the indices of all eight fins. The fin indices of the small and large fish were compared, controlling for farm effect. With the exception of the dorsal fin, all the indices were larger for the small fish than for the large fish, but the magnitude of the difference was greater for some fins than others. In comparison with the fins of wild fish, the pectoral and dorsal fins appeared to be most eroded and the damage to these fins was evident even in the small fish. The erosion of the caudal, anal and ventral (or pelvic) fins was more prominent in the larger fish. Variations in the fin indices of the caudal, anal and ventral fins suggested that there was little variation between rearing units on the same farm, but that there was significant variation between individual fish in the same rearing units, and between fish on different farms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749604821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33749604821&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1136/vr.159.14.446
DO - 10.1136/vr.159.14.446
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
C2 - 17012609
SN - 0042-4900
VL - 159
SP - 446
EP - 451
JO - Veterinary Record
JF - Veterinary Record
IS - 14
ER -