Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

FELINE ALIMENTARY LYMPHOMA: 1. Classification, risk factors, clinical signs and non-invasive diagnostics

Vanessa Barrs*, Julia Beatty

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Practical relevance  Alimentary lymphoma (AL) occurs commonly in cats and exists as distinct subtypes that differ in their clinical course, response to treatment and prognosis. Accurate diagnosis is important to guide appropriate treatment. 
Clinical challenges  Differentiation of low-grade alimentary lymphoma from lymphoplasmacytic enteritis can be challenging, especially where endoscopic intestinal biopsies, which sample only the mucosa and submucosa, are used. The major differentials for intermediate- and high-grade alimentary lymphoma are other neoplastic and non-neoplastic intestinal mass lesions. The diagnosis of large granular lymphocyte lymphoma requires vigilance as it may be missed with routine diagnostics. 
Patient group  AL affects predominantly middle- to old-aged domestic crossbred cats (median age 10–13 years). 
Evidence base  The evidence supporting this review is grade II, III and IV, derived from prospective studies, retrospective case series, reviews, extrapolation from other species, pathophysiological justification and the combined clinical experience of those working in the field. © 2012, International Society of Feline Medicine and American Association of Feline Practitioners. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-190
JournalJournal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
Volume14
Issue number3
Online published27 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'FELINE ALIMENTARY LYMPHOMA: 1. Classification, risk factors, clinical signs and non-invasive diagnostics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this