Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach

    Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

    Abstract

    Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a methodology to evaluate a system, design, process or service for possible ways in which failures (problems, errors, risks and concerns) can occur. It is a group decision function and cannot be done on an individual basis. The FMEA team often demonstrates different opinions and knowledge from one team member to another and produces different types of assessment information such as complete and incomplete, precise and imprecise and known and unknown because of its cross-functional and multidisciplinary nature. These different types of information are very difficult to incorporate into the FMEA by the traditional risk priority number (RPN) model and fuzzy rule-based approximate reasoning methodologies. In this paper we present an FMEA using the evidential reasoning (ER) approach, a newly developed methodology for multiple attribute decision analysis. The proposed FMEA is then illustrated with an application to a fishing vessel. As is illustrated by the numerical example, the proposed FMEA can well capture FMEA team members' diversity opinions and prioritize failure modes under different types of uncertainties. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1768-1779
    JournalComputers and Operations Research
    Volume36
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

    Research Keywords

    • Evidential reasoning approach
    • Failure mode and effects analysis
    • Minimax regret ranking
    • Uncertainty modeling

    Policy Impact

    • Cited in Policy Documents

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this