Abstract
In Cambodia, the law gives space to overseas developers to intervene in SEZ planning within the territory of the country, which includes choosing locations, demarcation of the boundary, and construction of infrastructure or integration into the infrastructure system. After the completion of construction, SEZ developers are entitled to operate the SEZ with privileged policies.
Many scholars have explored the effective control of territory with extra-territorial actors’ involvement. Some studies argue the reason could be the capacity to exercise certain territorial control. But in fact, SEZ is created through negotiations among actors and their practices. Thus, we call for more attention to the agency of extra-territorial actors through intervention in the process of planning and boundary demarcation.
In this paper, we will explore the implementation process of SEZ planning under the legal framework of SEZ. We will use 2 cases to explain how overseas developers appropriate a number of techniques to intervene in this process of SEZ planning. The first is firm to firm partnership under the flexible design of national citizenship and more share occupation of the company. The second is firm and government partnership. The developer received more assistance from the local government but took more construction responsibilities such as infrastructure construction and new village development at the same time. Eventually, we argue that the SEZ in Cambodia represents a flexible form of territorialization, which is related to a dynamic relation of the national state, local government, local enterprises, and overseas developers.
Many scholars have explored the effective control of territory with extra-territorial actors’ involvement. Some studies argue the reason could be the capacity to exercise certain territorial control. But in fact, SEZ is created through negotiations among actors and their practices. Thus, we call for more attention to the agency of extra-territorial actors through intervention in the process of planning and boundary demarcation.
In this paper, we will explore the implementation process of SEZ planning under the legal framework of SEZ. We will use 2 cases to explain how overseas developers appropriate a number of techniques to intervene in this process of SEZ planning. The first is firm to firm partnership under the flexible design of national citizenship and more share occupation of the company. The second is firm and government partnership. The developer received more assistance from the local government but took more construction responsibilities such as infrastructure construction and new village development at the same time. Eventually, we argue that the SEZ in Cambodia represents a flexible form of territorialization, which is related to a dynamic relation of the national state, local government, local enterprises, and overseas developers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Presented - 9 Apr 2021 |
| Event | American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting 2021 (AAG 2021) - Virtual, Seattle, United States Duration: 7 Apr 2021 → 11 Apr 2021 https://www2.aag.org/aagannualmeeting/ https://www.mountainresearchinitiative.org/events/details/2021-04-07/217-aag-annual-meeting-2021 |
Conference
| Conference | American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting 2021 (AAG 2021) |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | AAG 2021 |
| Place | United States |
| City | Seattle |
| Period | 7/04/21 → 11/04/21 |
| Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Extra-territorialization: actors, territory and power relations——SEZ in Cambodia in the context of BRI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver