Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Extending the theory of goal ambiguity to programs: Examining the relationship between goal ambiguity and performance

Chan Su Jung

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

One of the main assumptions of empirical studies conducted on the influence of goal ambiguity in public management is that goal ambiguity relates negatively to performance. However, this relationship has rarely been tested at the program level because common goal ambiguity and performance measures for disparate government programs have been scant. The availability of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) results for a number of federal programs provides the opportunity for an analysis testing the foregoing assumption. Measures of program goal ambiguity-target, timeline, and program evaluation-are shown to have negative relationships with different program performance scores, taking into account alternative influences or biases on performance. This analysis extends the theory of goal ambiguity by providing the first analysis of large-sample federal programs. The theoretical and practical implications are presented in the discussion and conclusion. © 2014 by The American Society for Public Administration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-219
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extending the theory of goal ambiguity to programs: Examining the relationship between goal ambiguity and performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this