Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon

  • Xuan Wang*
  • , Colette L. Heald
  • , Jiumeng Liu
  • , Rodney J. Weber
  • , Pedro Campuzano-Jost
  • , Jose L. Jimenez
  • , Joshua P. Schwarz
  • , Anne E. Perring
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

51 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Organic aerosols (OA) that strongly absorb solar radiation in the near-UV are referred to as brown carbon (BrC). The sources, evolution, and optical properties of BrC remain highly uncertain and contribute significantly to uncertainty in the estimate of the global direct radiative effect (DRE) of aerosols. Previous modeling studies of BrC optical properties and DRE have been unable to fully evaluate model performance due to the lack of direct measurements of BrC absorption. In this study, we develop a global model simulation (GEOS-Chem) of BrC and test it against BrC absorption measurements from two aircraft campaigns in the continental US (SEAC4RS and DC3). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare simulated BrC absorption with direct aircraft measurements. We show that BrC absorption properties estimated based on previous laboratory measurements agree with the aircraft measurements of freshly emitted BrC absorption but overestimate aged BrC absorption. In addition, applying a photochemical scheme to simulate bleaching/degradation of BrC improves model skill. The airborne observations are therefore consistent with a mass absorption coefficient (MAC) of freshly emitted biomass burning OA of 1.33 mg-1 at 365 nm coupled with a 1-day whitening e-folding time. Using the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model integrated with the RRTMG radiative trans-fer model, we estimate that the top-of-the-atmosphere allsky direct radiative effect (DRE) of OA is 0.344 Wm-2, 10% higher than that without consideration of BrC absorption. Therefore, our best estimate of the absorption DRE of BrC is C 0.048 Wm-2. We suggest that the DRE of BrC has been overestimated previously due to the lack of observational constraints from direct measurements and omission of the effects of photochemical whitening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)635-653
Number of pages19
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume18
Issue number2
Online published19 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was supported by EPA (RD-83503301-0) and NOAA (NA16OAR4310112). Rodney J. Weber was supported through a NASA Radiation Sciences Program grant NNX14AP74G. Pedro Campuzano-Jost and Jose L. Jimenez were supported by NASA NNX15AT96G. Joshua P. Schwarz and Anne E. Perring were supported by the NOAA Atmospheric Composition and Climate Program, the NASA Radiation Sciences Program, and the NASA Upper Atmosphere Research Program.

Research Keywords

  • SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL
  • ABSORPTION ANGSTROM EXPONENT
  • GLOBAL FIRE EMISSIONS
  • BIOMASS-BURNING SMOKE
  • LIGHT-ABSORPTION
  • BLACK CARBON
  • OPTICAL-PROPERTIES
  • HIGH-RESOLUTION
  • MIXING STATE
  • MASS

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this