Exploring the mediating role of government–public relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic : A model comparison approach
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102231 |
Journal / Publication | Public Relations Review |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 4 |
Online published | 15 Jul 2022 |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2022 |
Link(s)
Abstract
This study proposed, tested, and compared three models to examine an antecedent and outcome of government–public relationships. It conducted three surveys of 9675 people in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong from August 2020 to January 2021. The results of the model comparison supported the proposed reciprocal model: not only were relational satisfaction and relational trust found to mediate the effect of perceived responsiveness on people’s word-of-mouth intention to vaccinate, but they also had a reciprocal influence on each other. This study further affirmed that the relative effects between satisfaction and trust. We also found that emotion-dominant model is more powerful than cognition-dominant model, i.e., people’s feeling of satisfaction happens before sense of trust, which results from their perceived organizational responsiveness and then contribute to their word-of-mouth behavioral intention. The theoretical and practical implications of this study were also discussed.
Research Area(s)
- COVID-19, Government–public relationships, Model comparison, Perceived responsiveness, Word-of-mouth intention
Citation Format(s)
Exploring the mediating role of government–public relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: A model comparison approach. / Wang, Yuan; Huang, Yi-Hui Christine; Cai, Qinxian.
In: Public Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 4, 102231, 11.2022.
In: Public Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 4, 102231, 11.2022.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review