Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinantsof value

James A. Ohlson, Beate E. Juettner-Nauroth

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

765 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper develops a parsimonious model relating a firm's price per share to, (i), next year expected earnings per share (or 12 months forward eps), (ii), short-term growth (FY-2 versus FY- l) in eps, (iii), long-term (asymptotic) growth in eps, and, (iv), cost-of-equity capital. The model assumes that the present value of dividends per share (dps) determines price, but it does not restrict how the dps-sequence is expected to evolve. All of these aspects of the model contrast sharply with the standard (Gordon/Williams) text-book approach, which equates the growth rates of expected eps and dps and fixes the growth rate and the payout rate. Though the constant growth model arises as a peculiar special case, the analysis in this paper rests on more general principles, including dividend policy irrelevancy. A second key result inverts the valuation formula to show how one expresses cost-of-capital as a function of the forward eps to price ratio and the two measures of growth in expected eps. This expression generalizes the text-book equation in which cost-of-capital equals the dps-yield plus the growth in expected eps. © 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-365
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Volume10
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Research Keywords

  • Devidend policy
  • EPS
  • EPS growth
  • Equity valuation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinantsof value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this