TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanded reliability-based design approach for drilled shafts
AU - Wang, Yu
AU - Au, Siu-Kui
AU - Kulhawy, Fred H.
PY - 2010/7/1
Y1 - 2010/7/1
N2 - This paper develops a more general reliability-based design approach for drilled shafts that formulates the design process as an expanded reliability problem in which Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are used in the design. Basic design parameters, such as the shaft diameter (B) and depth (D), are formulated as discrete uniform random variables. Then the design process becomes one in which failure probabilities are developed for various combinations of B and D [i.e., conditional probability p(Failure{divides}B,D)] and are compared with a target probability of failure pT. Equations are derived for this expanded reliability-based design (RBDE) approach, and criteria are established for the minimum number of MCS samples to ensure a desired level of accuracy. Its usefulness is illustrated using a drilled shaft design example. This RBDE approach has the following advantages: (1) it gives results that agree well with current RBD designs, but it improves the resolutions of the designs; (2) it offers design engineers insight into how the expected design performance level changes as B and D change; (3) it gives design engineers the ability to adjust pT, without additional calculation effort, to accommodate specific needs of a particular project; and (4) it is transparent and "visible" to design engineers who are given the flexibility to include uncertainties deemed appropriate. Finally, the effects of uncertainties in the at-rest horizontal soil stress coefficient (K0) and allowable displacement (ya) are illustrated using this approach. © 2011 ASCE.
AB - This paper develops a more general reliability-based design approach for drilled shafts that formulates the design process as an expanded reliability problem in which Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are used in the design. Basic design parameters, such as the shaft diameter (B) and depth (D), are formulated as discrete uniform random variables. Then the design process becomes one in which failure probabilities are developed for various combinations of B and D [i.e., conditional probability p(Failure{divides}B,D)] and are compared with a target probability of failure pT. Equations are derived for this expanded reliability-based design (RBDE) approach, and criteria are established for the minimum number of MCS samples to ensure a desired level of accuracy. Its usefulness is illustrated using a drilled shaft design example. This RBDE approach has the following advantages: (1) it gives results that agree well with current RBD designs, but it improves the resolutions of the designs; (2) it offers design engineers insight into how the expected design performance level changes as B and D change; (3) it gives design engineers the ability to adjust pT, without additional calculation effort, to accommodate specific needs of a particular project; and (4) it is transparent and "visible" to design engineers who are given the flexibility to include uncertainties deemed appropriate. Finally, the effects of uncertainties in the at-rest horizontal soil stress coefficient (K0) and allowable displacement (ya) are illustrated using this approach. © 2011 ASCE.
KW - Foundation
KW - Limit states
KW - Pile
KW - Simulations
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651514081&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78651514081&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000421
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000421
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1090-0241
VL - 137
SP - 140
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
JF - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
IS - 2
ER -