Evidentiality and identity positioning in online disputes about language use in Hong Kong

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

7 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Article number5604
Pages (from-to)53-74
Journal / PublicationJournal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Volume14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

This paper analyses online disputes amongst a group of students about the use of language (Cantonese versus Putonghua) in Hong Kong. Using evidentiality and identity positioning frameworks, we analyse 44 student posts to a proprietary online forum. Particular attention is paid to the construction of a Hong Kong social identity, the various identity positions that underpin such a construction, and how such identity work is supported by the use of evidentiality. The analysis shows that Hong Kong locals are most often constructed as an oppressed, marginalised minority who are denied the right of authentic expression and are subject to a process of politically expedient cultural denigration. The analysis also shows that evidential choices are intimately bound with identity positions at both the discourse-production level and discourse-content level. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for applied linguistics in Hong Kong's schools and universities. © 2020, EQUINOX PUBLISHING.

Research Area(s)

  • Cantonese and putonghua in Hong Kong classrooms, Evidentiality, Identity positioning, Online discussion

Bibliographic Note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].