@inproceedings{dbba0d750a8e4d4d9fe07ba5f386365f,
title = "Evaluating the performance of the survey parser with the NIST scheme",
abstract = "Different metrics have been proposed for the estimation of how good a parser-produced syntactic tree is when judged by a correct tree from the treebank. The emphasis of measurement has been on the number of correct constituents in terms of constituent labels and bracketing accuracy. This article proposes the use of the NIST scheme as a better alternative for the evaluation of parser output in terms of correct match, substitution, deletion, and insertion. It describes an experiment to measure the performance of the Survey Parser that was used to complete the syntactic annotation of the International Corpus of English. This article will finally report empirical scores for the performance of the parser and outline some future research. {\textcopyright} Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.",
author = "Fang, {Alex Chengyu}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/11671299_19",
language = "English",
isbn = "3540322051",
volume = "3878 LNCS",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "168--179",
booktitle = "Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing",
address = "Germany",
note = "7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, CICLing 2006 ; Conference date: 19-02-2006 Through 25-02-2006",
}