Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Estimates and inferences in accounting panel data sets: comparing approaches

  • Felix Canitz
  • , Panagiotis Ballis-Papanastasiou
  • , Christian Fieberg
  • , Kerstin Lopatta
  • , Armin Varmaz*
  • , Thomas Walker
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review and evaluate the methods commonly used in accounting literature to correct for cointegrated data and data that are neither stationary nor cointegrated.
Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted Monte Carlo simulations according to Baltagi et al. (2011), Petersen (2009) and Gow et al. (2010), to analyze how regression results are affected by the possible nonstationarity of the variables of interest.
Findings - The results of this study suggest that biases in regression estimates can be reduced and valid inferences can be obtained by using robust standard errors clustered by firm, clustered by firm and time or Fama–MacBeth t-statistics based on the mean and standard errors of the cross section of coefficients from time-series regressions.
Originality/value - The findings of this study are suited to guide future researchers regarding which estimation methods are the most reliable given the possible nonstationarity of the variables of interest.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-283
JournalJournal of Risk Finance
Volume18
Issue number3
Online published15 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Cointegration
  • Nonstationarity
  • Regression estimates
  • Regression inferences
  • Stationarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimates and inferences in accounting panel data sets: comparing approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this