Enhanced continuous biohydrogen production by immobilized anaerobic microflora

Zhen-Peng Zhang, Kuan-Yeow Show, Joo-Hwa Tay, David Tee Liang, Duu-Jong Lee

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biohydrogen production from suspended, biofilm, or granular sludge fed with a glucose substrate was examined in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and anaerobic fluidized bed reactors (AFBRs) operating at a temperature of 37 °C and a pH of 5.5. Comparing with a hydrogen production rate of 0.32 L/(L·h) by suspended sludge in the CSTR, a 10-fold and a more than 20-fold increases in hydrogen production rate were achieved by granular sludge in the CSTR and granular or biofilm sludge in AFBRs, respectively, while keeping a comparable hydrogen yield with the suspended culture. Although a comparable performance in hydrogen production was demonstrated by both granular sludge and biofilm. in the AFBRs, the biofilm may be washed out and replaced completely in a longer term of operation. Formation of granular sludge and biofilm substantially enhanced biomass retention which was closely associated with reactor configuration and hydrogen production performance. A granule-base column-shaped reactor system appears to be the preferred process for continuous hydrogen fermentation on glucose substrate. © 2008 American Chemical Society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-92
JournalEnergy and Fuels
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhanced continuous biohydrogen production by immobilized anaerobic microflora'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this