English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Writing: Making the case

John Flowerdew*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This introductory review article for this special issue sets out a range of issues in play as far as English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing is concerned, but with a special emphasis on English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) (as opposed to English for General Academic Purposes (EGAP)). Following the introduction, the article begins by outlining the different types of EAP and presenting the pros and cons of ESAP and EGAP for writing. It then goes on to review work in a range of areas of relevance to ESAP writing. These areas are register and discourse analysis; genre analysis; corpus analysis; ethnography; contrastive rhetoric; classroom methodology; critical approaches; and assessment. The article concludes by arguing that whichever model of writing is chosen (EGAP or ESAP), or if a hybrid model is the choice, if at all possible, students need to be exposed to the understandings, language and communicative activities of their target disciplines, with students themselves also contributing to this enterprise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-32
JournalWriting & Pedagogy
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Research Keywords

  • ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES (EAP)
  • ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC ACADEMIC PURPOSES (ESAP)
  • WRITING
  • SPECIFIC PURPOSES WRITING
  • REGISTER AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
  • GENRE ANALYSIS
  • CORPORA
  • ETHNOGRAPHY
  • CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC
  • CLASSROOM METHODOLOGY
  • CRITICAL APPROACHES
  • ASSESSMENT
  • GENRE-ANALYSIS
  • DISCOURSE COMMUNITY
  • 3 TRADITIONS
  • STUDENTS
  • TEXT
  • ESL
  • SCHOLAR
  • TASKS
  • LIST

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Writing: Making the case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this