Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Electromagnetic stress at the boundary: Photon pressure or tension?

  • Shubo Wang
  • , Jack Ng
  • , Meng Xiao
  • , Che Ting Chan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

46 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

It is well known that incident photons carrying momentum k exert a positive photon pressure. But if light is impinging from a negative refractive medium in which k is directed toward the source of radiation, should light exert a photon "tension" instead of a photon pressure? Using an ab initio method that takes the underlying microstructure of a material into account, we find that when an electromagnetic wave propagates from one material into another, the electromagnetic stress at the boundary is, in fact, indeterminate if only the macroscopic parameters are specified. Light can either pull or push the boundary, depending not only on the macroscopic parameters but also on the microscopic lattice structure of the polarizable units that constitute the medium. Within the context of an effective-medium approach, the lattice effect is attributed to electrostriction and magnetostriction, which can be accounted for by the Helmholtz stress tensor if we use the macroscopic fields to calculate the boundary optical stress.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1501485
JournalScience Advances
Volume2
Issue number3
Online published11 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • effective medium
  • electromagnetic stress
  • metamaterial
  • negative-refractive-index material
  • optical pulling force
  • Photon pressure

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electromagnetic stress at the boundary: Photon pressure or tension?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this