TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrochemical iron production to enhance anaerobic membrane treatment of wastewater
AU - Hu, Zhetai
AU - Zheng, Min
AU - Hu, Shihu
AU - Hong, Pei-Ying
AU - Zhang, Xueqing
AU - Prodanovic, Veljko
AU - Zhang, Kefeng
AU - Pikaar, Ilje
AU - Ye, Liu
AU - Deletic, Ana
AU - Yuan, Zhiguo
PY - 2022/10/15
Y1 - 2022/10/15
N2 - Although iron salts such as iron(III) chloride (FeCl3) have widespread application in wastewater treatment, safety concerns limit their use, due to the corrosive nature of concentrated solutions. This study demonstrates that local, electrochemical generation of iron is a viable alternative to the use of iron salts. Three laboratory systems with anaerobic membrane processes were set up to treat real wastewater; two systems used the production of either in-situ or ex-situ electrochemical iron (as Fe2+ and Fe2+(Fe3+)2O4, respectively), while the other system served as a control. These systems were operated for over one year to assess the impact of electrochemically produced iron on system performance. The results showed that dosing of electrochemical iron significantly reduced sulfide concentration in effluent and hydrogen sulfide content in biogas, and mitigated organics-based membrane fouling, all of which are critical issues inherently related to sustainability of anaerobic wastewater treatment. The electrochemical iron strategy can generate multiple benefits for wastewater management including increased removal efficiencies for total and volatile suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand and phosphorus. The rate of methane production also increased with electrochemically produced iron. Economic analysis revealed the viability of electrochemical iron with total cost reduced by one quarter to a third compared with using FeCl3. These benefits indicate that electrochemical iron dosing can greatly enhance the overall operation and performance of anaerobic membrane processes, and this particularly facilitates wastewater management in a decentralized scenario. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Although iron salts such as iron(III) chloride (FeCl3) have widespread application in wastewater treatment, safety concerns limit their use, due to the corrosive nature of concentrated solutions. This study demonstrates that local, electrochemical generation of iron is a viable alternative to the use of iron salts. Three laboratory systems with anaerobic membrane processes were set up to treat real wastewater; two systems used the production of either in-situ or ex-situ electrochemical iron (as Fe2+ and Fe2+(Fe3+)2O4, respectively), while the other system served as a control. These systems were operated for over one year to assess the impact of electrochemically produced iron on system performance. The results showed that dosing of electrochemical iron significantly reduced sulfide concentration in effluent and hydrogen sulfide content in biogas, and mitigated organics-based membrane fouling, all of which are critical issues inherently related to sustainability of anaerobic wastewater treatment. The electrochemical iron strategy can generate multiple benefits for wastewater management including increased removal efficiencies for total and volatile suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand and phosphorus. The rate of methane production also increased with electrochemically produced iron. Economic analysis revealed the viability of electrochemical iron with total cost reduced by one quarter to a third compared with using FeCl3. These benefits indicate that electrochemical iron dosing can greatly enhance the overall operation and performance of anaerobic membrane processes, and this particularly facilitates wastewater management in a decentralized scenario. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Anaerobic wastewater treatment
KW - Electrochemical iron dosing
KW - Membrane fouling control
KW - Sulfide control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139339789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85139339789&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119202
DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119202
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
C2 - 36215837
SN - 0043-1354
VL - 225
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
M1 - 119202
ER -