Efficient electrosynthesis of n-propanol from carbon monoxide using a Ag–Ru–Cu catalyst

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

167 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • Pengfei Ou
  • Adnan Ozden
  • Sung-Fu Hung
  • Jason Tam
  • Christine M. Gabardo
  • Jane Y. Howe
  • Jared Sisler
  • Koen Bertens
  • F. Pelayo García de Arquer
  • Rui Kai Miao
  • Colin P. O’Brien
  • Ziyun Wang
  • Jehad Abed
  • Armin Sedighian Rasouli
  • Mengjia Sun
  • Alexander H. Ip
  • David Sinton
  • Edward H. Sargent

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-176
Journal / PublicationNature Energy
Volume7
Issue number2
Online published10 Feb 2022
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

The high-energy-density C3 fuel n-propanol is desired from CO2/CO electroreduction, as evidenced by propanol’s high market price per tonne (approximately US$ 1,400–1,600). However, CO electroreduction to n-propanol has shown low selectivity, limited production rates and poor stability. Here we report catalysts, identified using computational screening, that simultaneously facilitate multiple carbon–carbon coupling, stabilize C2 intermediates and promote CO adsorption, all leading to improved n-propanol electrosynthesis. Experimentally we construct the predicted optimal electrocatalyst based on silver–ruthenium co-doped copper. We achieve, at 300 mA cm−2, a high n-propanol Faradaic efficiency of 36% ± 3%, a C2+ Faradaic efficiency of 93% and single-pass CO conversion of 85%. The system exhibits 100 h stable n-propanol electrosynthesis. Technoeconomic analysis based on the performance of the pilot system projects profitability.

Citation Format(s)

Efficient electrosynthesis of n-propanol from carbon monoxide using a Ag–Ru–Cu catalyst. / Wang, Xue; Ou, Pengfei; Ozden, Adnan et al.
In: Nature Energy, Vol. 7, No. 2, 02.2022, p. 170-176.

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review