TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of membrane properties on the performance of a hybrid GAC and ultrafiltration process for water treatment
AU - Qiao, Tiejun
AU - Wu, Guangxue
AU - Zhang, Xihui
AU - Au, Doris W. T.
AU - Zhang, Jinsong
PY - 2012/6/1
Y1 - 2012/6/1
N2 - The performance of a hybrid granular activated carbon (GAC) and ultrafiltration (UF) process for water treatment was investigated using five types of UF membranes. The removal percentages for chemical oxygen demand (COD Mn), particles (≥2μm) and total bacteria by the hybrid process were 30-40%, 98-99% and 76-92%, respectively. No invertebrates were detected in the hybrid process effluent. Transmembrane pressure and specific permeate flux (SPF) of the five types of membranes varied. With decreasing membrane pore sizes, removal of COD Mn and particles increased, whereas SPF firstly decreased and then increased. Hydrophilic membranes had a relatively high COD Mn removal potential, but did not obviously affect particle removal or SPF. © 2012 Taylor & Francis.
AB - The performance of a hybrid granular activated carbon (GAC) and ultrafiltration (UF) process for water treatment was investigated using five types of UF membranes. The removal percentages for chemical oxygen demand (COD Mn), particles (≥2μm) and total bacteria by the hybrid process were 30-40%, 98-99% and 76-92%, respectively. No invertebrates were detected in the hybrid process effluent. Transmembrane pressure and specific permeate flux (SPF) of the five types of membranes varied. With decreasing membrane pore sizes, removal of COD Mn and particles increased, whereas SPF firstly decreased and then increased. Hydrophilic membranes had a relatively high COD Mn removal potential, but did not obviously affect particle removal or SPF. © 2012 Taylor & Francis.
KW - Drinking water
KW - Granular activated carbon
KW - Membrane properties
KW - Microbial safety
KW - Ultrafiltration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862537226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862537226&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1080/09593330.2011.626801
DO - 10.1080/09593330.2011.626801
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
C2 - 22856309
SN - 0959-3330
VL - 33
SP - 1353
EP - 1359
JO - Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)
JF - Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)
IS - 12
ER -