Abstract
This paper attempts to examine how market forces have affected educational development in Hong Kong and Mainland China. In both places, there has been a trend to the decentralisation and marketisation of education in recent years, particularly in the realm of higher education. Based upon recent research conducted in Hong Kong and China, the author argues that higher education in these two places has been significantly affected by emerging market forces. The core of the paper is confined to the discussion of two major issues: user charges and the introduction of "competition" and cost recovery in education. The main focus of this paper is on what strategies educational institutions in Hong Kong and China have employed in response to the strong tide of marketisation. Particular attention will be given to discussing how markets and competition have affected the governance and delivery of educational services in Hong Kong and China. This comparative study has demonstrated that even though the recent developments in higher education in these two places have been experiencing a similar global trend, the global tide of universal trend in which private charges, market competition, non-state provision, corporate governance, system-wide performance management should not be treated as a simplistic notion of undifferentiated universal trend. Instead, different places may take different configurations in cases of marketization which remain national-specific as well as global. © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133-158 |
| Journal | Higher Education |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Funding
The author wants to thank Prof. P. Wilding, Prof. P. Jones and the referees of Journal of Higher Education for reading the manuscript, giving very useful and insightful comments to improve the present draft. Of course, the author is solely responsible for any omissions and errors. The present paper is based upon the author’s recent research project on “Comparative Education Policy”. Thanks must be expressed to the Department of Public and Social Administration, City University of Hong Kong for granting fund to support this comparative study.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Education and the market place in Hong Kong and Mainland China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver