Dominance-Based service selection scheme with concurrent requests
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 89-104 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Computing Science and Engineering |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Link(s)
Abstract
In dynamic Web service environments, the performance of the Internet is unpredictable; the reliability and effectiveness of remote Web services are also unclear. Therefore, it can hardly be guaranteed that the quality of Web service (QoWS) attributes of Web services do not fluctuate with the dynamic Web service environments. When a composite service is planned in the context of dynamic service environments, there is another aspect which has not been taken into account by existing works, namely, concurrency - the fact that multiple requests to a composite service may arrive at the same time. Considering the dynamics of Web service environments and concurrency of requests, we propose in this paper a service selection scheme which adopts top-k dominating queries to generate a composition solution rather than only select the best composition solution for a given request. The experimental results have investigated the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach and shown that it outperforms baseline and traditional methods for service selection. © 2012. The Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers.
Research Area(s)
- Concurrency, Dominance, Dynamics, Service selection, Top-k
Citation Format(s)
Dominance-Based service selection scheme with concurrent requests. / Tang, Chaogang; Li, Qing; Xiong, Yan et al.
In: Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 89-104.
In: Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 89-104.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review