Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dominance biases in the perception and memory for the faces of powerholders, with consequences for social inferences

  • Xijing Wang*
  • , Ana Guinote
  • , Eva G. Krumhuber
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

A great deal of research has shown that dominant-looking faces are afforded power. In this research, we tested the reverse link. As such, we examined whether knowledge of a target's power would lead to a dominance bias in face perception. Five studies were conducted by applying face morphing techniques to both controlled facial stimuli and faces of powerholders in the real world. Results showed that faces of powerholders were misrecollected (Studies 1A and 1B) and misperceived (Studies 3A and 3B) as more dominant-looking than their powerless counterparts. In addition, their faces were misrecollected as more prototypically dominant in physical appearance than they actually were (Studies 1A, 1B, and 2). Furthermore, enhanced facial dominance affected social inferences, with evaluations such as competence and attractiveness being sensitive to the gender of the target person (Study 3B). Implications for research on power and face perception are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-33
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Research Keywords

  • Attractiveness
  • Dominance
  • Face perception
  • Gender
  • Memory
  • Power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dominance biases in the perception and memory for the faces of powerholders, with consequences for social inferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this