Abstract
The last decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in business and human rights (BHR) from soft law to hard law. Although the Global South has pushed for an international treaty, legislators in Europe turned their focus from international law to domestic mandatory human rights due diligence (mHRDD) laws with extraterritorial implications, enforcing localized human rights standards globally. This Article examines the impact of mHRDD legislation as global BHR regulation from a Third World Approaches to International Law perspective. The Article makes three contributions. First, it argues that the current divide between the Global North and South continues a historical struggle over setting international rules on multinationals. Second, it illustrates how Eurocentric mHRDD laws could become de facto global BHR regulation and perpetuate historical inequalities. Third, it examines the ramifications of mHRDD laws on the ongoing BHR treaty process, advocating the latter as a more equitable and effective solution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 319-415 |
| Journal | American University International Law Review |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Mar 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Domestic Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Laws as Global Business and Human Rights Regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver