Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does wealth equate to happiness? an 11-year panel data analysis exploring socio-economic indicators and social media metrics

  • Feng Huang
  • , Huimin Ding
  • , Nuo Han
  • , Fumeng Li
  • , Tingshao Zhu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

37 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

The Easterlin paradox questions the link between economic growth and national well-being, emphasizing the necessity to explore the impact of economic elasticity, income inequality, and their temporal and spatial heterogeneity on subjective happiness. Despite the importance of these factors, few studies have examined them together, thus ongoing debates about the impact of economics on well-being persist. To fill this gap, our analysis utilizes 11 years of panel data from 31 provinces in China, integrating macroeconomic indicators and social media content to reassess the Easterlin paradox. We use GDP per capita and the Gini coefficient as proxies for economic growth and income inequality, respectively, to study their effects on the subjective well-being expressed by citizens on social media in mainland China. Our approach combines machine learning and fixed effects models to evaluate these relationships. Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. This study makes a synthetic contribution to the debate on the Easterlin paradox, indicating that economic growth can enhance well-being if income inequality is kept below a certain level. Although these results are theoretically enlightening for the relationship between economics and national well-being globally, this study's sample comes from mainland China. Due to differences in cultural, economic, and political factors, further research is suggested to explore these dynamics globally. © 2024 Huang et al.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0301206
Number of pages19
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume19
Issue number4
Online published10 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding

Tingshao Zhu received the Scientific Foundation of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.E2CX4735YZ).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  3. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  4. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Research Keywords

  • Economic Development
  • Happiness
  • Gini coefficient
  • health disparity
  • human
  • income inequality
  • social media
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does wealth equate to happiness? an 11-year panel data analysis exploring socio-economic indicators and social media metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this