Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta-Analysis

Bert George*, Richard M. Walker, Joost Monster

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    337 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

    Abstract

    Strategic planning is a widely adopted management approach in contemporary organizations. Underlying its popularity is the assumption that it is a successful practice in public and private organizations that has positive consequences for organizational performance. Nonetheless, strategic planning has been criticized for being overly rational and for inhibiting strategic thinking. This article undertakes a meta-analysis of 87 correlations from 31 empirical studies and asks, Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A random-effects meta-analysis reveals that strategic planning has a positive, moderate, and significant impact on organizational performance. Meta-regression analysis suggests that the positive impact of strategic planning on organizational performance is strongest when performance is measured as effectiveness and when strategic planning is measured as formal strategic planning. This impact holds across sectors (private and public) and countries (U.S. and non-U.S. contexts). Implications for public administration theory, research, and practice are discussed in the conclusion.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)810-819
    JournalPublic Administration Review
    Volume79
    Issue number6
    Online published15 Oct 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

    Research Keywords

    • MUNICIPAL-GOVERNMENT
    • MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
    • MOTIVATION
    • SECTOR
    • WORK

    Publisher's Copyright Statement

    • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this