Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence

Hyunjin Kang*, Ki Joon Kim

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized both the roles and functions of everyday objects and how users interact with them. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and an advanced capacity for communication, smart objects can now function as communication sources and deliver persuasive messages. This study investigates how different types of agency and source cues shape the persuasiveness of a smart object via social presence. When users interacted with a smart object that exerted its own agency, they sensed greater social presence when the object used machine cues rather than human cues. Conversely, when users interacted with a smart object that allowed the user to exercise their own agency, human cues, rather than machine cues, produced greater feelings of social presence, which enhanced the persuasiveness of the messages conveyed by the object. However, the persuasive effects of social presence were reversed when the interaction prompted AI anxiety in the user.
Original languageEnglish
Article number107152
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume129
Online published18 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Research Keywords

  • Internet of things
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Persuasion
  • User agency
  • Machine agency
  • Source cue
  • Social presence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does humanization or machinization make the IoT persuasive? The effects of source orientation and social presence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this