TY - JOUR
T1 - DOES AIR POLLUTION REDUCE SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING? EVIDENCE FROM CHINA'S MICRO SURVEY DATA
AU - Yu, Yunjiang
AU - Shu, Xing
AU - Zhou, Jiawen
AU - Anwar, Sajid
AU - Yang, Sibo
AU - Zhang, Yuting
PY - 2024/2/6
Y1 - 2024/2/6
N2 - Previous studies have not paid much attention to the heterogeneous effects of air pollution on subjective well-being. By matching the 2018 China Labor-Force Dynamics Survey data (CLDS2018) with urban air pollution data, we empirically examine the impact of air pollution on subjective well-being across pollution levels, income levels, gender, age, education as well as city size and region. Empirical analysis shows that an increase in air pollution has a negative and statistically significant impact on the well-being and the effect varies considerably across pollution levels, income levels, age, gender, education level, city size and region. Re-estimation using air pollution data released by the US embassy in China shows that the empirical results presented in this paper are robust. After accounting for potential endogeneity, PM2.5 continues to have a significant negative impact on the well-being of residents. Air pollution can affect an individual's mental health, social networks and economic status, which in turn affects their subjective well-being. Our analysis shows that air pollution is an important contributor to the Easterlin paradox, and (in the process of air pollution control) attention needs to be paid to both individual heterogeneity and urban differences. © 2023 World Scientific Publishing Company.
AB - Previous studies have not paid much attention to the heterogeneous effects of air pollution on subjective well-being. By matching the 2018 China Labor-Force Dynamics Survey data (CLDS2018) with urban air pollution data, we empirically examine the impact of air pollution on subjective well-being across pollution levels, income levels, gender, age, education as well as city size and region. Empirical analysis shows that an increase in air pollution has a negative and statistically significant impact on the well-being and the effect varies considerably across pollution levels, income levels, age, gender, education level, city size and region. Re-estimation using air pollution data released by the US embassy in China shows that the empirical results presented in this paper are robust. After accounting for potential endogeneity, PM2.5 continues to have a significant negative impact on the well-being of residents. Air pollution can affect an individual's mental health, social networks and economic status, which in turn affects their subjective well-being. Our analysis shows that air pollution is an important contributor to the Easterlin paradox, and (in the process of air pollution control) attention needs to be paid to both individual heterogeneity and urban differences. © 2023 World Scientific Publishing Company.
KW - Air pollution
KW - China
KW - heterogeneity
KW - PM2.5
KW - subjective well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184591293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85184591293&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1142/S0217590823500625
DO - 10.1142/S0217590823500625
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0217-5908
JO - Singapore Economic Review
JF - Singapore Economic Review
ER -