Do local governments save and spend across budget cycles? evidence from North Carolina
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 152-169 |
Journal / Publication | American Review of Public Administration |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2012 |
Link(s)
Abstract
The fiscal crisis encountered by state-local governments since 2008 has again made prominent the issue of how to better prepare for and stabilize expenditures during recessions. Does the stabilization function of government, and its theory, still hold? Previous studies focus on federal and state levels; only a few look at local governments. This article explores whether localities save and spend across the boom-bust cycle; we intend to identify the determinants of local government savings and estimate the impact of savings on stabilizing expenditures. Unlike some early evidence that shows countercyclical stabilization properties of local unreserved general fund balance, the empirical results of our study on North Carolina counties do not support the stabilization role by localities. This study carries timely and important implications for state/local policy making and financial operations; it also adds to the literature on the stabilization function of government. © SAGE Publications 2012.
Research Area(s)
- fund balance policy, local financial management, stabilization function of government
Citation Format(s)
Do local governments save and spend across budget cycles? evidence from North Carolina. / Wang, Wen; Hou, Yilin.
In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 42, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 152-169.
In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 42, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 152-169.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review