Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner-Level Evidence

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

48 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-112
Journal / PublicationJournal of Accounting Research
Volume54
Issue number1
Online published6 Nov 2015
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Abstract

This study investigates whether companies engage in audit opinion shopping activities by exerting influence over an audit firm's decision to switch the engagement partner ("partner-level opinion shopping") in the Chinese setting, where the identities of engagement partners are publicly disclosed. Adopting the empirical framework developed by Lennox [2000], we show evidence that companies successfully engage in partner-level opinion shopping. Further, partner-level opinion shopping is more likely to be successful if a company is economically important to an audit firm, and it is less likely to be successful if the audit firm is formed as a partnership rather than a corporation. We also find that companies successfully engaging in partner-level opinion shopping exhibit significantly lower earnings quality. Finally, we directly compare audit records between incoming and outgoing partners and find that, for companies that successfully improve audit opinions after partner switching, incoming partners have a significantly higher propensity to issue clean opinions than their outgoing counterparts.

Research Area(s)

  • Audit quality, Individual auditor, Opinion shopping, Partner switch

Citation Format(s)

Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner-Level Evidence. / CHEN, FENG; PENG, SONGLAN; XUE, SHUANG; YANG, ZHIFENG; YE, FEITENG.

In: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 54, No. 1, 03.2016, p. 79-112.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review